Note: Send all email to editor@impiousdigest.com.

Abortion Quotes Update

From: Sarah [sarah5775@optonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 6:27 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: Abortion Quotes

Anne Rice Expressionism

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:46:07 -0800 (PST)
From: jessica johnson <iczerfae@yahoo.com>
Subject: Anne Rice Expressionalism
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
 

Although I have not read all of her books, I feel that Anne Rice has a genius creative streak. Her vampire series as you know have made tons of money and people continue to buy her books every day. As for the German art, I'm not sure that this is every Germans' outlook on her books. I admit they they are off the wall sometimes. But what it really comes down to is preference. I think the idea of a vampire searching for God is int

riguing, the idea that vampires were created when a malevolent spirit enter a human body, that they have emotions and a conscience appeals to some and not others. if you have read a book where a vampire goes down on a menstruating women please let me know so I can stay away from it. It is tasteless but other than that I love her books. Her writing style allows you to almost feel the joy or sorrow or anger of the character.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Jessica Johnson

Dear Jessica,

I guess Rice is an acquired taste (pardon the pun). It's hard reading any writer who can devote two pages just describing what kind of suit a character is wearing. As for the horrific art featured in that article, it's anyone's guess where it came from.  It was on some German site, and somehow, that didn't surprise me. Anyway, it was all tongue in cheek.

The Ed

Dear Theodore,

I don't see the quotation from Christian and Jewish Genocide above as implying Karl May is Hitler. It does imply Hitler liked to emulate his characters, but also says he liked to misquote the bible. In fact, if we were to accept Hitler's reading of the Bible, Jesus blessed his gassing of the Jews and was delighted to reincarnate as Hitler himself.

In other words, the quotation is pointing out Hitler's knack for completely misreading or perverting books and scriptures for his own ends.

Personally, have I read Karl May's books? No. But I would love to and if indeed they are online I want to read them. You raise a good point and I don't think the author's intention was to imply Karl May could be compared to Hitler. What is true, however, is that killing for racist reasons, and the practice of genocide, did exist in the Old West in America- not the Old West in Germany. The genocide of the Native American may not exist in the books of Karl May, as you say, but in the cold reality of American history, it is denied by no one; not even the most shameless apologist. The concentration camps built in the 19th century to segregate the Native American still exist, and are still populated today; they are called Indian reservations.

Dear Amanda,

More here...

i am not sure what triggered your reaction to vincente fox's support of the new stamps to be released. what is portrayed by the images on these stamps is an extremely popular cartoon in latin america that in no way is made to portray black people. with my mom being from ecuador, growing up with these cartoons and while being in ecuador myself, the clothing that is worn by the monkeys is regular attire in latin america. the elderly woman is in fact dressed like an elderly mexican woman who is going about her chores, or at least how they typically dressed in the past. how do i know? because my grandmother dressed in clothing almost identical to the woman in the stamp, and the boy is dressed in clothing that is worn in just about any country on earth. what DOES make these stamps look racist towards black people is the black stigma produced by american culture. if you want to bash someone over this whole ordeal, it should be the history of our fine country that was formed on the backs of the countless oppressed people whom are still being held down by society. when you look at the stamp with the elderly lady, and their distorted faces, you know what comes to mind? blackface. why? no, not because the stamps were made out of blackface images. because blackface is part of american culture. the cartoon characters are innocent portrayals of latin americans in the form of monkeys.

if you dont agree, thats fine. just giving you another view from someone who seems a little more certain about the history than a person who is so quick to call vicente fox a son of a bitch.

mohammad

Dear Mo,

So you assume this perspective came from someone who wasn't of Mexican heritage? Wrong. I am, and that's why I was furious. It's an ass-backward and racist portrayal of blacks- period. When I was a child, my mother often took me to Mexico to get in touch with my roots, and the first thing that struck me as I read the comic books in the waiting areas was the racism I saw in certain comic books like Mermin. It is an ignorant portrayal, because the black population Mexico is virtually nil, and only someone unfamiliar with black culture would appeal to it. Like here in America, such racism takes root most deeply in areas where no blacks exist.

I remember one image in one comic book, a mock ad, of a sleeping black man leaning against a trash can. The caption read something along the line of "Trash belongs in its place." At the time, I couldn't have been more than five. But it sickened me. The Mexican broadcast media is little better. Indigenous people are generally portrayed as simpletons, whilst soap operas and news broadcasts feature light skinned people almost exclusively. Check out a Mexican soap opera. All the characters look like Anglo kids, you will be hard pressed to find one female protagonist that even resembles the typical brown-skinned people representative of 90% of Mexico. Now, Mexico does have areas where light-skinned people dominate, like Zacatecas, but this isn't representative of the nation.

Mexico can never hope to retain first world status while embracing racist ideology like that promulgated by the stamps, which sanctions bigotry with state approval. The movers and shakers of the world now include more black people than Mexicans.  Vicente Fox shouldn't have allowed the stamps to print. He did, and now he has to face the music. He is a stupid fucking prick. The Secretary of State, Condaleeza Rice, is black. How can he possibly hope to have good relations with America when he insults our highest representative, this by implying he knows what is offensive to blacks, and she doesn't?

Jag

Lee Paquit in happier times with Joe McCarthy.

Joe McCarthy Can Have My Babies

Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lee Paquet <32Circl@xxxx.xxx
To: joe_mahma@impiousdigest.com
Subject: Open mind? Joe McCarthy......

Hello. I just read your bitter diatribe against Ann Coulter and Joe McCarthy. Why do you continue the lies against them? The evidence Ann cites in her book is there for all to see. Your satirical renditions of Limbaugh and Coulter were NOT funny. I excerpted the following from a speech, including publications backing McCarthy's efforts to publicize Communists infiltrating our government. Sorry your guys were wrong back in the 40's and 50's.

Joe McCarthy Was Right
Submitted by Don Capron

Joe McCarthy was right. Now that I've grabbed your attention, let me tell you why. For fifty years I trust there isn't an educator in either the academy or high schools who hasn't failed to castigate Joe McCarthy as a hate-monger, liar, destroyer of careers, and someone who routinely accused innocent people of wrong doing. McCarthy's detractors, Communists, and Soviet sympathizers never anticipated two things: One, the Venona intercepts and their subsequent release; Two, the collapse of Communism and the opening of Soviet files.

From 1943 until 1980, unbeknownst to virtually everyone, the National Security Agency intercepted every Soviet message going from or to the United States. It was not until 1994 that their existence was even acknowledged, and 1995 when the first 1,400 of 240,000 intercepts were released to the public. Their content was damning and supportive of the contentions of not only McCarthy but Whittaker Chambers, Elizabeth Bentley, Hoover, and others. The collapse of Communism opened files of not only internal Soviet spy documents but also gave the FBI, CIA, and American scholars access to the files of the American Communist Party that had been hidden in a Russian warehouse since 1950. The cat was out of the clichéd bag.

Was Robert Oppenheimer, the Director of the Atom Bomb Project at Los Alamos, New Mexico, a member of the Communist Party? Quite emphatically, no! His wife was. His brother was. His mistress was. As were many of his closest associates at the University of California. In addition, Oppenheimer was one of those scientists in the 40's who thought that all scientific information should be shared universally for the good of mankind. Were any of the aforementioned exposed by McCarthy? Not one. He'd been too late at the spy discovery game. After all, Alger Hiss got Richard Nixon the Vice-Presidency. White had been shifted to that historical ashbin where failures are allowed to "resign" to, the International Monetary Fund. Hiss, unquestionably the most brilliant of the rising stars at State at the age of 43, in 1947 became the head of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace; a position usually held by a senior citizen with insufficient retirement funds.

Hiss had gone to Johns Hopkins, Harvard Law, and had clerked at the Supreme Court for Felix Frankfurter. They all had impeccable credentials. It was one thing to catch a handful of Communists outside of government, as in the case of the Rosenbergs. It was quite another to expose the dirty secrets of the 1930's and 40's. That was McCarthy's sin.

Was he a pillar of virtue? Hardly! He was a dreadful alcoholic and eventually died from cirrhosis of the liver. He was a bully, unkempt, crude, and a lout. He once unmercifully pummeled Drew Pearson, his antagonist in the press, after a dinner party, in the coat room of a Washington doyenne. He had many physical and character shortcomings. But he was right.

For all those rushing to put pen to paper to denounce any of the above, you'd be best advised to first do your "homework". Read "Venona" (Yale University Press); "The Secret World Of American Communism" (Yale University Press); "The Haunted Wood" (Random House); "The Venona Secrets" (Regnery); "The Secret History Of the KGB" (Basic Books); "Whittaker Chambers: A Biography" (Modern Library); and "Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the life and legacy of America's most hated Senator" (Free Press). If at first you haven't read the above, then you are coming unarmed for a battle of wits.
I am an educator who will continue to expose the lies of the left.

Lee A. Paquet.

Shakespeare sayeth unto Lee...

"Feminist? Burn not thine  bra unless thou still be in it."

Joe Mahma Replies

Dear Lee,

Like scatology, Ann Coulter is somewhat of an acquired taste. I take offense at your assumption I'm a leftist. How many leftists do you know who are pro-life? You say I am continuing the lies against McCarthy and Coulter. What lies? Consider the latter. She has said things, publicly and on video, that would make Ghandi bitch slap the hate-mongering imbecile. For example, when it comes to the genocide of the Native American, she refers to them as peyote smoking "savages" that "went around scalping people" and then refers to Arabs as "camel-riding nomads." If anyone would toss a Koran in the toilet, it would be her.

Which reminds me. Was it a couple of hijacked camels that hit the World Trade Center on 9-11?

She also suggests that dissidents should be put in "administrative detention under John Ashcroft."  At the same time, she writes about the liberals who supported concentration camps for Japanese-Americans in WWII. Liberals this, liberals that. Liberals is the term she uses for anyone who disagrees with her. She's pathetic. (see Hate is Not Pretty for Ann Coulter C-SPAN video excerpts ) 

You know who else was infiltrating high office during the Red Scare? According to a 1964 House Investigative Committee report on Un-American Activities, the KKK. In fact, they made it to places the Commies never dreamed of: the Supreme Court. And they certainly killed more Americans than any domestic Commie ever did, and not just during the Civil  Rights era. In fact, they haven't stopped. While you spank your tiny pud to this Aryan meth whore, just remember the stand she has taken against institutional racism and the Klan in particular. Oh wait. She hasn't taken one. They are her patrons too.

Joe Mahma

Shakespeare sayeth unto Phil...

"Mark Twain put it best:  'There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. And also, your mother is a whore.'"

Typos and Crappy Stats!

From:Maguire, Phil [mailto:Phil.Maguire@Takata.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1:35 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: ON your statistics...
 

You may want to have someone with a basic high school level grasp of math check over your statistics.  Your second set of statistics state that 16% of abortions take place at less than or equal to 6 weeks, 17% at 7 weeks, 21% eight weeks 64% Beyond 9 weeks.  That adds up to 118% plus 4% error.  Plus those numbers do not match the 58% of abortions that take place in the first eight weeks... way to look credible.

Dear Phil,

You imply that one typo in  dozens of cited statistics discredits the whole argument in question. I will, for the sake of argument, agree you are correct that the stats are in error. Fine.

From this paltry concession, however, you conclude the entire pro-life argument has no credibility. For this to be accurate, however, you must also discredit the rest of the stats and the survivors, witnesses, medical literature, doctors, et al, that were also cited in the articles. This you did not do. Why?

Could it be the only thing you bring to the table is a evidence of a typo and nothing else? Is this your idea of bringing the entire pro-life movement to a halt? Way to look credible, butt goblin.

Thou fool! thou pestilent pile of duh! Try again!

The Ed

From: XXXXXXXX [mailto:coconutXXX@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:54 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

Quothe Coconut "...most women get abortions in the 1st or 2nd trimester... and it's not even a baby yet when it doesn't have a brain, fingers, or toes." Wrong. Pictured here is a baby at  10 weeks, first trimester. It has fingers, toes, and unlike Jessica, a brain. (Click image to enlarge) Source here. Not Fake One of the genuine photos which cost abortion providers a libel case: another baby at 10 weeks. Other pictures here. For a similar letter, see below. (Click image to enlarge)

Coconut rides home from the abortion clinic, about to give us a piece of her mind.

To whom it may concern,

I am very concerned on what you are trying to get across and promote in your article Roe vs. Wade. The pictures you are showing are not valid pictures of

all abortions. [sic]  In fact there are different kinds. The pictures you are showing [are the] the illegal  kind which is 7th and 8th trimester [sic] when in all reality most women get abortions in the 1st or 2nd  trimester for valid reasons and it's not even a baby yet when it doesn't  have a brain, fingers, or toes. Do you think jacking off is killing a millions of babies or a women having her period is killing a baby?

I think your sending a false message to women of all ages. There are different types of abortions and the ones you are showing is not even legal. [sic]  It is the women's choice to decide and that can be for numerous of reasons it is not a case of not wanting a child (It is not even a life until a certain trimester) It's a case of rape, incest, being a drug addict and not wanting to bring a child up as a drug addict, a child being born with AIDS, having children in some case could harm the women's life. Many of these women eventually choose to adopt or have children with the right person and the right time. You are sending a very bad message you need to be open minded and look at both sides.

Baby at 7th to 8th trimester. Kool-Aid Man Says you're a Tard, and We Agree

Here, Kool-Aid Man explains how he came to be, using sperm as an analogy to water, and the egg as an analogy to the flavored Kool-Aid powder. He notes that water and and powder are not the same thing. He is a product of both, to be sure, but is now "a unique, new and delicious chemical reaction" which we know and love as Kool-Aid.

Dear Coconut,

7th and 8th trimesters? Are you saying, perchance, that the average pregnancy lasts 21-24 months rather than 9? How neat!

So yes, in one respect you are correct. Killing a fetus at the 7th or 8th trimester is illegal, because we're now talking birthed children over a year old.

For someone concerned about getting the facts straight and looking at both sides, you start off your argument with a series of falsehoods.

1. You say late-term abortions are illegal. They are not. Late-term abortion is not illegal in any state. Though laws were passed prohibiting some forms of them, the federal courts have struck them down, including the last attempt to control late-term abortions which was signed into law by President Bush in 2004. This was struck down by a federal judge in New York City circa last summer.

2. You compare the unfertilized egg to the fertilized one. No doctor would ever do such a thing, and your doing it shows an appallingly poor understanding of basic biology. You also compare sperm to the fertilized egg, again, the kind of idiocy even Planned Parenthood avoids. You assert, therefore, that the egg alone can create life, and that the sperm alone can create life. You may as well equate a glass of water and a pack of  Kool-Aid powder to the grape drink it produces, or a seed to a plant.

3. You say the pictures are false.  However, the doctors who signed the papers asserting the examined fetal remains and fetal photos are real did so under oath. They had no problem repeating these assertions when the libel case was tried and abortion providers lost a case in which they wrongly claimed the pictures were fakes.

4. You cite rape and the possibility of birth defects as the usual reason women abort, as opposed to career, convenience and financial considerations; which is the real reason most women abort, according to the Allen Guttamacher Institute (the abortion industry's favored statisticians). Let us keep in mind that the Nazis also had a policy of killing the handicapped and mentally retarded. (Since they killed the retarded, this could have put you in the cross-hairs, so your excusing such behavior betrays a disturbing, albeit understandable self-hatred.) Why did the Nazis kill the mentally handicapped? They did it for "economic considerations" because they were "useless eaters". Pretty much the same reason women abort children with or suspected of having birth defects: for "economic considerations."

A visit at an Auschwitz memorial site notes:

"By 1945 two out of every three European Jews had been killed by the Nazis. 1.5 million children were murdered. This figure includes more than 1.2 million Jewish children, tens of thousands of Gypsy children and thousands of handicapped children."  Click here for source site.

P.S. According to the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, or CBR, those photos not signed and examined by doctors themselves  come from several other sources: "'The first source is the authoritative, William's Obstetrics, 20th Edition, Gary Cunningham, MD, Paul C. MacDonald, MD, Norman F. Gant, MD, Kenneth J. Leveno, MD, Larry C. Gilstrap III, MD, Gary D. V. Hankins, MD & Steven L. Clark, MD (Copyright 1997 by Appleton and Lange, A Simon & Schuster Company) beginning at page1026, Table 44-4, "Predicted Menstrual Age (MA) in Weeks From Crown-Rump Length (CRL) Measurements (in Centimeters)"

CBR's physicians also rely on a highly regarded book called The Color Atlas of Clinical Embryology, 2nd Edition, Keith L. Moore, T.V.N. Persaud & Kohei Shiota (Copyright 2000 by W. B. Saunders Company) at page 49, Table 2–1,

"Criteria for Estimating Developmental Stages in Human Embryos." This reference contains age to crown/rump length relationships, etc. from 19-21 days post-conception through 56 days (the end of the embryonic period). At page 52, Table 3-1, you will find criteria for establishing age through the fetal period, including age-crown/rump length relationships from 9 weeks through 38. '"

Apron Boys: Hi! I'm a tool! Sara Lee, eat your heart out. Masons prepare for a ritual bake off in Sweden. The judge is a mason too, so the girl scouts don't stand a chance. The guy in the middle is a new initiate.    Monty Python Masonic Spoof: A Classic

From: xxxxxx [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 9:21 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: More Anti-Masons

I Googled more stuff on Ex-Masons...I thought you might find this link interesting...

• Ex-Masons for Jesus
• Death, Burial and Resurrection in the Masonic Lodge
• Unearthing the Mysteries of the Freemasons  (N.B.-this website is also a great resource...it outlines their pagan practices of annexing American cities which date back to Egyptian ones).

Many secrets of the Masons are revealed... It becomes apparent to the reader that the subjects are drawn in by intrigue and curiosity and then unknowingly brainwashed-The ones who actually thought about was going on, and were decent Christians, renounced the paganism; I guess the others who realize it renounce their faith, which probably allows them to obtain higher levels in the order.

Furthermore:

"King Solomon himself lost favor with the Lord because his wives led him astray, and he followed other gods, including Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians, Chemosh, the god of Moab, and others. He also built a temple for Moloch, pictured here, a god worshipped with the mass incineration of children.* (1 Kings 11:4-13) For such rebelliousness the glory of the Lord would depart from Solomon's Temple, never to return." (Quoted from your own website.)

"The candidate is caused to represent a character named Hiram Abif. Even though there is no historical evidence to back up any part of the "drama" that is about to unfold, it is explained to the candidate, or initiate, that Grand Master Hiram Abif was the Grand Architect at the building of King Solomon's Temple. Supposedly, Hiram knows some sort of a secret which, by its mere possession, a person would be allowed to pass himself off as a Master Mason, or journeyman builder, if you will, thus allowing him to travel and work in foreign countries, and to receive Masters' wages.

Supposedly this "Hiram Abif" built Solomon's Temple.

"Masonic scholar Albert Mackey, in his Manual of the Lodge, taught that the legend of Hiram Abif was borrowed from the ancient mysteries of early Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece. Hiram represents the gods Osiris, Baal and Bacchus.

The compass and square, an emblem often seen in Masonic art and engraving, represents ancient pagan solar deities. Men initiated into Freemasonry's 32nd degree are not told that the symbol depicts Osiris the sun-god and Isis, the 'goddess of a thousand names.'"

Anyway Hiram Abif=Baal=the god jeezebel and her false prophets worshiped in the Old Testament, causing Solomon to lose favor with God, thus God leaving his temple. There is no doubt in my mind that the name Baal is synonymous with Satan. Hiram Abif is believed to have constructed the temple of Solomon, this may perhaps include more than one temple---the temples that were built for false gods. One must look at this in an allegorical sense: Solomon's literal temple was the one built, supposedly, by Hiram Abif-now, freemasons (as the ex-mason highlights later in his explanations) are ("Some of the most sublime symbolisms of Freemasonry relate to the building of this spiritual temple under the principles and tenets of Freemasonry, based upon the building of Solomon's Temple by Operative Masons.

These Operative Masons constructed the material temple of stones, cedars, with ornamentations of gold and precious stones, while Freemasons are constructing the spiritual temple of moral, ethical and spiritual virtues.") masons that construct temples of "morals." It is butchery of the word "morals" to use it in context with masons, but the main meaning of the ritual comes through-the subject being initiated takes on the role of Abif (satan) and symbolically "dies" and is "resurrected." The Masons' allegorical symbol becomes apparent-the Masons place Satan under the role of Christ, mocking the mere essence of Christianity and "baptizing" their subjects. Abif also may symbolize more than just Satan, but also literally the initiate...many new age religions embrace the worship of "self"...aka the worship of bullshit. The idea of Satanism is that man becomes his own god, this is synonymous with the beliefs of freemasonry and "new agers." No, this isn't the new age, just recycled shit from prehistoric times.

Self worship pretty much says that you should only care about yourself and no one else. The worship of self has led to such wonderful world events such as the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution (starting communism in Russia), and Nazism. (The first two were examples of effete upper classes more concerned with fucking and eating than their own people, and the second addressing the fact that Nazis believed that the Aryan race was superior to all others, as though they were gods.)

Keep up the good work and know that you're not alone.

Dear Colin,

Thomas Paine, the author of "Common Sense" and a major catalyst of the American Revolution, wrote an interesting and authoritative piece on the origin of Freemasonry, and does parallel some of what you just mentioned regarding ancient pagan religions. You can download the PDF and see the web version here.

According to Paine,  "From these reports and declarations of Masons of the highest order in the institution, we see that Masonry, without publicly declaring so, lays claim to some divine communication from the creator, in a manner different from, and unconnected with, the book which the Christians call the bible; and the natural result from this is, that Masonry is derived from some very ancient religion, wholly independent of and unconnected with that book. To come then at once to the point, Masonry (as I shall show from the customs, ceremonies, hieroglyphics, and chronology of Masonry) is derived and is the remains of the religion of the ancient Druids; who, like the Magi of Persia and the Priests of Heliopolis in Egypt, were Priests of the Sun."

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto the Readers

"Mason, behold thyself, and be not proud. Black & Decker never made a better tool."

Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:49:54 -0500
From: Colin Mayer <colinmayer@gmail.com>
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: The Counter-Masonic Order

To all the authors, editors and anyone else involved with this website:

Thank you for your insight in everything that you have written about; so far it's flawless, connected, and makes sense to the highest degree. Your thesis on the Book of Revelation is brilliant, fortified in stone, while other ones (such as the seventh day Adventist theory) are no better than a house built on sand. Let it be known that I have learned more from your website in two days than all the watered down shit I've heard on the news for the past years. It all makes sense; to atheists, faltering Christians and "new agers" this site would seem like "just a vast conspiracy." To those who are intelligent, and view the world skeptically, however, realize that it is a giant plot, but there's one mastermind behind it. He's the entity that no one believes exists anymore. Satan. To most it would seem like madness, but what you propose is no different than Cassandra prophesying the fate of Troy to its people; man no longer believes that evil exists in the world.

However:

The control that evil has gained over society has deeply disturbed me.I was wondering if you (or any other of the journalists working for your website) have ever discovered any evidence of a secret order to counter the growing evil of the masonic, satanic and evil orders? The church, of course, would be the most obvious balance to the debauchery of the masons and Satanists, but have you come across anything else in your research?

Respectively,

Colin N. Mayer

Dear Colin,

Historically, such an opposition has occurred here in America. In fact, in the 1830s it became a political party that offered a presidential candidate. As Christian opposition to slavery grew, abolitionists realized that the fiercest supporters of expanding slavery were freemasons, particularly in the south. This, among other factors which included a crisis in the judicial integrity of the nation, helped create the Anti-Masonic Party.

It's inevitable that any society of men who lives to undermine the rights of those less fortunate than themselves will reap what they sow. It's also inevitable that the more intelligent elements of the wronged class, upon understanding the structure and discipline of a given order, will emulate and and improve the tactics of the same when attacking it in kind. Therein lies the risk of becoming what you hate most. Can one counter evil with evil? Hate with hate?

Awareness is the answer. There really is no need for a secret order; those who seek justice and the preservation of rights have nothing to be ashamed of, their fight is a noble one. Those, however, who seek to undermine the judiciary system, or law enforcement, their quest for secrecy is rooted in the fact that their deeds are illegal and odious.

Is it odious to do good, and be your brother's keeper? to love your fellow American as yourself? Knowledge is power, so be good to your neighbor: empower him. Share what you find with them.

At bottom, most masons join their order because they seek status, rank. They want to be admired or respected by peers. But if peers think less of you because you're a grown man and still play childish games; still wear an apron and silly one-legged slacks, robes or hoods, learn secret handshakes, earnestly seek the company of bigots and racists; if this is how  the world eventually perceives you... then the incentive to join the company of such men will diminish. And it is for this reason the mason begins to hate those outside the order: it's not that most outside the order are necessarily clueless, it's that they know exactly what's going on. They just chose a better way, one that didn't yoke them to an unknown master, and still allowed them to excel without favoritism.

As silly as this sounds, even dangerous, the mason should be more pitied than feared.  Involuntary slavery is bad enough, but voluntary slavery cannot be achieved without total absence of human dignity. And in freemasonry, there can be no Masters without Slaves, and the latter make up 99% of the orders, whether Klan or York rite masons.

What secrets can any order hold today, in this age of information? Right now, we have the technology to prove definitively whether or not a man is lying. I don't mean a standard lie detector test either. It's a device that measures the brain activity in certain areas of the brain which are lit up when a person attempts to lie. Lies force the brain to think more as opposed to a person whom is simply telling the truth: it's common sense but now the technology exists to actually see it as it happens. Undoubtedly, this type of lie detector is used in interrogating enemy combatants, and you can't cheat on it. So eventually the time will come when this device will be admissible in court.

Who do you think fears that most of all?

The Ed

From: John Cooper [xxxxxx@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 5:08 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: KKK Robe

Hey man,

Love the site. Kicks ass.

Anyway; was bumming around a few websites when I came across this old-time postcard of an original KKK Robe. You'll notice that the robe is red, not white, and has an Islamic cresent-moon and star over the right side of the chest. The postcard was originally published in 1912, and the robe is currently in the possession of the Giles County Historical Society; or so says the website, which you can find at:

http://www.rootsweb.com/~tngiles/postcard/kkk01.htm#robe

Take care, man. And keep up the good work.

John.

 

Shakespeare sayeth unto Robert...
"Quoth  Othello: 'Expired NASCAR tickets in hand, Robert's sister didst drop her panties in trade, and in one stroke was his kin and his wife deflowered. Verily, I ruleth.'"

A Klansman/Vampire Hunter Writes...

Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:47:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Robert H <vampire8hunter@yahoo.com>
Subject: A Klansman
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

You can bad mouth the Ku Klux Klan all you want but I know for a fact Non-Whites make up a good 90% of the problems in The White Mans World!

Dear Robert,

With a screen name like vampire8hunter@yahoo.com, how can anyone question your grasp of reality?

Hmm. You hunt vampires. What else do you hunt? werewolves? zombies? Bigfoot?  may I offer a suggestion?

Why not hunt for what you really and truly want? Something, like say... some enormous Aryan cock to keep your otherwise pointless yapper occupied? (Don some kneepads and hang around the Green Room at the Jerry Springer Show, you might get lucky.)

Better yet, why not hunt for a clue, you inbred Dixie Prick?

I won't dignify your email with a serious response- it might imply your opinion matters and that you don't, as a race terrorist, embarrass every white man on earth by association.

Eat me, sheet head.

Shakespeare sayeth unto Steve...

"Behold, most impious imbecile, this gesture is not copyright protected either; I offer it freely."

Falsely Asserting Copyright Infringement to Censor Online Content

Some background on the last two letters: these are posted to illustrate the abuse of copyright law to censor our online content (i.e., knocking an entire site offline). The issues herein have since been resolved and Simhauser has apologized.

Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:00:59 -0500
From: "S.C.Simshauser" <72567.2742@compuserve.com>
Subject: Gylarian

Greetings,

I can only presume whoever is using the pen-name "Gylarian" in your publication picked up the term from my published works. I suppose that in some ways I should be flattered. However your use of it is injurious to my work.

This is my second email regarding this. I have discussed the use of my character race name with a lawyer who deals in matters of intellectual property rights for science fiction writers and he advises I have recourse that could be pursued.  I'd prefer we settle this calmly and amicably (writer-to-writer).

It appears some work has been done - and I thank you. but, the job is not yet complete.

Please remove/change the word "Gylarian" from your publications, pages, stories, and files.
Thank-you.

Hell, changing it to "GayRyan" would satisfy me -just quit using "gylarian" and expunge the word "gylarian" from your website.
to wit:

http://impiousdigest.com/tom_of_finland.htm
http://impiousdigest.com/CNN_com -Cult leader 13th Sniper Victim
(I checked CNN, "gylarian" doesn't show up in their searches.)
http://impiousdigest.com/hospital.htm
http://impiousdigest.com/parishioners.htm
impiousdigest.com/Love_Cave_2.htm
etc.

I wish you well, just stop harming me.

Respectfully yours,
Steve Simshauser

Steve Simhauser

Dear Steve,

Not only is your IP claim asinine and insulting, you're barking up the wrong tree. If I wanted to harm your fragile ego, I would write a scathing review of your works online and really give you something to cry about. Now, the burden of proof is on you. Where is the copyright infringement specifically? If you can give me one paragraph or even one line of text that has been copied from your published works, I'll remove all references to Gylarian and post an apology on page one.

However...

Gylarian was used as a screen name, not a pen name, by the writer in question. Nor is it clear that he has ever read your work. In fact, it is not clear if anyone has. From what I can tell, you write comic books, and the writer is a grown man.

You cannot sue for infringement on the use of a character's name when it is not used for commercial purposes or used in the process of communicating it via print or broadcast media. In fact, you cannot copyright it all. According to the authority here, the US Copyright Office:

"WHAT IS NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT?

Several categories of material are generally not eligible for federal copyright protection. These include among others:

Works that have not been fixed in a tangible form of expression (for example, choreographic works that have not been notated or recorded, or improvisational speeches or performances that have not been written or recorded)

Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans; familiar symbols or designs; mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring; mere listings of ingredients or contents..."

You cannot sue an internet user who chooses a character from your works as a screen name. For example, Batman the movie is copyrighted and the name is a trademark. Yet if I want to, I can make a screen name like BatmanLovesMe@aol.com. can I be sued for it? Sure, one can be sued for breathing in America. This doesn't make a triable case. The question is whether or not the lawsuit will be tossed out of court outright, and how much you'll have to fork out in court costs for wasting everyone's time..

Gylarian, as referred to in the works cited, is the screen name of the writer. It is not his pen name.

You can register a trademark on that name, and then sue anyone who uses it FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES if you're so intent on making an ass of yourself.

Like myself, the digest's legal counselors couldn't help but chuckle when I passed this email on to them. Thanks for the shits and giggles :-)

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Steve...

"Thy fiction sucketh profoundly. Copyright thy excrement, and thou shalt sooner see a royalty."

Steve Watches "Law and Order"

Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:53:36 -0500
From: "S.C.Simshauser" <72567.2742@compuserve.com>
Subject: Gylarian - violation detailed
Sender: "S.C.Simshauser" <72567.2742@compuserve.com>
 

Note: use of the term "Gylarian" is protected under common-law trademark -which was established by its first use in commerce (i.e. first sale). Insofar as the geographic region of use, sales were throughout the US and Canada, (and some in a few in other countries). I see no choice except to file for federal registration, which would reinforce the common-law trademark and be retroactive to its first use.  Don't worry, you haven't offended my ego or sensibilities. However, as a writer who makes money selling manuscripts to publication editors, et.al., I must consider my market.

The editors I sell to are likely people who surf the web. There is a probability that they will visit your website. On your site they are likely to pick up an association between the word "gylarian" and a homosexual who stuffs bottles up his ass. Subsequently, when they are asked to review and pass judgement on a manuscript of mine, their judgement may be tainted (even if only at the sub-conscious level) by the link between my story protagonist and images of bottles getting extracted from assholes. And as a result, I contend what is on your site reduces my likelihood of a sale.

The potential reduction of future sales and dilution of value are my primary concerns and why I ask you to change the screen name (pen-name, whatever you may to call it) to something that does not overlap my work or infringe my trademark.

The lawyer I've talked with cited an instance for comparison: Warner Bros., who holds the trademark for "Harry Potter", a few years ago sent notice to some kid who had set up a "harrypotterguide.co.uk" fansite. The Warner notice said they were in violation of trademark and lawsuits would be filed.  A bit draconian (a request for removal or royalty/licensing would have been sufficient), but Warner was legally correct and within their rights (and the website no longer exists). [sic]

So, contrary to popular belief, violation of trademark does not require "commercial use". As I understand the legalities, the test is whether or not the use dilutes the value or confuses the link between source and product. A lot of people have similar misconceptions about copyright.

The webmaster/editor is responsible for the content of their system/site. Upon becoming aware of illegal content, regardless of its source, they are obligated to take corrective action or else risk being found guilty of complicity. Now that the email address of the original offender is known, he will also be contacted.

I do not call for all the material on IMPIOUSDIGEST.COM and its subpages be taken down, only that the instances of use of my trademark be changed throughout the site (search-and-replace/respell the one word). If there are other remedial actions you would like to suggest, I'll think about it.

I try to ask nicely -and assume I'm dealing with a reasonable intellect. If I offend, my apologies -and I can make adjustments. With that in mind, I send this letter to the initial offender, the offending site, and its ISP.

Please correct your violation.
Failure to comply will prompt me to consider further actions.

Regards,
Steve Simshauser
 

Dear Steve,

Please consider this action before any other: blow me and self-immolate.

In Warner Bros vs. 15 yr. old Clair Field...

Warner Bros. sent a legal letter, and after a media outcry, backed down after bullying the young girl. Here's an excerpt from a press article on the case:

"It was a 'clerical error' and there had been a 'terrible misunderstanding'. That what WB's head of publicity had to say anyway. In fact, so impressed is WB by Claire's site (which, frankly, is better that all the bells-and-whistles official sites) that it might give Claire a free licence to become an official Potter site. Wow! Lucky girl."
 

Warner Bros Backs down on Harry Potter Web Site The Register, 15 December 2000

Even if Warner Bros. did sue and win, this does not compare to someone's non-commercial use of a trademarked race of space dragons  for a screen name. For starters, the young webmaster in the said case actually went to the trouble of registering "Harry Potter" as a domain without authorization. Warner Bros. was perhaps within their right, but as you can see, by attacking a fan site they only bred enmity. 

Under your argument, however, Trekkies who make screen names like Klingon on their internet account would be liable for infringement. For the sake of argument, I'll pretend copyright and trademark supersedes the 1st amendment and that those who use Klingon in their screen names are guilty of infringement; but even so, simply referring to someone by their given screen name  is PERFECTLY FUCKING LEGAL.

My copyright attorney and I spoke about this over lunch today and she said it was a 1st Amendment no-brainer. After bursting into laughter because your lawyer cited a case that blew up in Warner Bros. face, she offered the following:

Let's say a woman loves your shitty ass work and names her child Gylarian, but that child grows up to be a homosexual who shoves bottles up his ass. Would you have a right to make him change his name because his fetish  "subliminally diminishes the value of your work?" I'm sorry, but no. You're not that good, no one is and no  copyright law or trademark was never meant to extend so far.

But what if this guy also makes a gay porn site with the url gylarian.sucks.com. Would you have a right to sue?  Nope. Not unless he slanders you do you have legal recourse via libel laws. And even if it is a commercial fetish site, he still had no role in the creation of his own name. Hence, you would have to sue his mom. And then, because she has nothing to do with the site or his fetish, you're screwed. And much less would you have a right to sue those who refer to this man by his given name.

You may ask him to change his name, however. And he may even do it. Legally, however, you cannot force him to do it. Nor can you sue his mother for naming him Gylarian or for refusing to pay you royalties.

Wait. Actually, you can. Again, you can sue a man for breathing but...

In this particular case, you stand to lose more money than you'd earn on royalties or sales. In US courts, the plaintiff is liable for court fees when and if the case is lost, and my lawyers are hungry for litigation, because they smell blood.

All of which is to say, you're a goddamned fool and the only reason I'm even bothering to address your claim is to illustrate the abuse of copyright law to censor online content. My ISP did take my site down completely for a few minutes, I'm not sure if you had anything to do with it. (We're still investigating this.)

You should hope it was not on your account, because if it was on account of your threat, this actually did result in a triable grievance, and if anyone has cause for legal action it certainly isn't you.. Even though impiousdigest.com was offline for just a few minutes, the legal department here is debating whether or not your false accusations to our ISP constitute a serious libel on your part, if indeed they did, as a false pretense, result in the interruption of this site's operation.

P.S.

Clair Field's Harry Potter Guide is still online.

http://www.harrypotterguide.co.uk/

Shakespeare sayeth unto Kyle...

"Thou tard. Behold thyself, and be not proud. Craftsman and Black & Decker never made a better tool."

Pissed off DeMolay MasonInsists he's No Tool

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:15:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Kyle Corwin <kj_corwin@yahoo.com>
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

Shakespeare sayeth unto Limbaugh Fan:

"Most unholy tool, thou art a shittohead."

From: "jerry vanek" <lnlproductions@netzero.com>
To: joe_mahma@impiousdigest.com

greetings
 

i, too, oppose abortion, as any person with a moral conscience should.

however, your silly comments about ann coulter and rush limbaugh defy common sense.

it would appear that you are just insanely jealous because either of these two brilliant people could eat your lunch, any day of the week, and are far more respected and well-known than you could ever hope to be.

rush is "full of shit"? what a pathetically dull comment. rush is brilliant, and so is ms. coulter.

i think when it comes to weighing n on the phenomenon of talk radio and conservative commentators, you should actually leave that to people who actually know what they are talking about, because clearly, you do not.

your problem, other than lack of discernment, is the lack of a sense of humor. both ann and rush are amazingly funny, witty, and piercingly accurate in their comments.

try laughing at liberals, it's really the only way to deal with them.
they are totally ignorant on

most every pressing issue. furthermore, both rush and ann have a track record of converting many, though you say that their methods and tone preclude that.

can you say the same?

jv
nashville tn

"All junkies should die like pigs in prison. Except me."

Rush's catering arrives on flatbed truck.

Joe Mahma Replies...

Others Disagree with Jerry in Regards to Rush and Ann...

Conservatives Sick of Ann

From: CoulterWatch <coulterwatch@yahoo.com>
Subject: Ann Coulter
To: joe_mahma@impiousdigest.com

Dear Joe,

I am the President of Citizens for Principled Conservatism (www.PrincipledConservative.org) and am unalterably opposed to everything that Ann Coulter represents (www.CoulterWatch.com). My essays and talk radio appearances have been highly critical of Coulter and her extremist worldview. Essay examples include: Ann Coulter's Paradigm, War Heroes and Villains and Ann Coulter Defames Jesus Christ.

Please contact me regarding Ann Coulter.

Thanks in advance.

Dan Borchers

CoulterWatch@yahoo.com

Cell: XXXXXXXX

Missing Content on Communism

Shakespeare sayeth unto you:

"Friends don't let friends email while Witnessing."

Are You the Anti-Christ?

DEAR CATHERINE,

ARE YOU READY? READY FOR YOUR MEDS? DOES THE SIMPLE LOGIC AND COURTESY OF RELEASING THE CAP LOCK KEY DEFY YOU?

I was debating whether or not to include the attachments you sent, but finally decided against it as a courtesy to our readers. (Two were passages from the Bible and one was some article on polar shifts and/or polar bears.)

First of all, mocking Joseph Smith or the Jehovas Witnesses is not mocking God. It's a public service. And what makes you think I'm anti-family? because I'm pro-life?

As for your question: no, I am not the Anti-Christ. If I was, I'd be editing the New York Times.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Bryan:

"You defend things you know nothing about because from day one you've agreed to have these same things hidden from you."

Scottish Rite Now Accepting Tards...

From: "Miller Service Co." <millerservice@comcast.net>
To: <editor@impiousdigest.com>
Subject: Scottish Rite
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 22:01:53 -0500

I can’t believe the propaganda that you are spewing forth!  I am an 18th Degree SR Mason and in all my years here in MO, I have never heard of such rubbish!  In order to get these degrees, a great deal of work goes into it.  I have never heard of nor has it been indoctrinated into me by my bretheren (sic) that the KKK is involved or that the SR sponsors the death penalty.  Nonsense to say the least!  I hope you are proud or your agenda.

 

-Bryan Miller

---

Dear Bryan,

There are times when charges are so obscene, the implications of one's certainty so devastating and grievous, you WANT to be wrong. You forsake the petty ego gratification of knowing you were right in favor of the humbling sting of error; maybe people are kinder than you thought, maybe man does know a limit to cruelty in the treatment of his brothers, even the "profane" as you masons call fellow Americans outside the Craft.

This is one of those of those times.

You'll never know know what the 33rd degree has planned for you until you get to the 30th degree. If you tell me you know the secrets of the 33rd degree masons, I'll know you're lying, because if you did know, you'd STFU and realize only someone from the inside could have known what's being discussed. Speaking of hard work, enlighten us, won't you? Just what did you have to do to advance? donate money? fund raise? corrupt a jury? intimidate a judge or bribe a coroner to make 36 stab wounds a suicide, not murder?

You're kept in the dark by degrees for a reason-- to be used for ends you know nothing about, because had you known it all from the beginning, your sense of decency would make you recoil in disgust or horror.

The fact remains your ilk created the Klan and defends them to this day. They have to, because the SR's complicity in covering the ass of Klan indiscretions, if fully exposed, would leave none of them in office. Look at the Oklahoma City Bombing trial. Look at the efforts to conceal Klan involvement the minute Tim McVeigh's ties to the Aryan Republican Army and Elohim City surfaced. Why do it? because the SR has members in both parties. Al Gore is Scottish Rite. So is Newt Gingrich, Trent Lott, etc. Look at Sen. Robert Byrd, a Democrat and Scottish Rite member also. Do you think the FBI doesn't know of his presence in at least one major Klan lynching of a black gentleman in W. Virginia? He was a Klan recruiter. The SR continues to dominate politics in the the South, regardless of party.

I never said the practices of the Templars, real and alleged, still continue today. I am saying that in many cases, as with the Klan, they are exceeded. The Templars spit and urinated on the cross in initiation ceremonies, but as a test. It's why Pope Clement the 5th pardoned them (albeit to no avail) circa the Templar persecutions which culminated in 1314's execution of Grand Master Jaques DeMolay. 

The Templar Knights of the Ku Klux Klan burn the cross: so in terms of desecration, how does this compare to spitting on it? Moreover, the man who created the ritual of the cross burning was a 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander, Albert Pike. Research it yourself, read both sides of the story and not just the elder-sanctioned paperbacks at your lodge library.

One of over 3,000 FBI documents pointing to white supremacist involvement in the Oklahoma City Bombing which were withheld in the McVeigh Trial.  (Click to enlarge)

Here's my challenge to you:

If you can prove the Klan was not founded by Confederate Scottish Rite masons, in particular Albert Pike... I'll shut down the site and offer an apology.

But if you cannot prove your claim, you owe everyone an apology, for breathing and for wasting our time.

It seems to me you expect us to believe you just because

• you say so

• because you're a mason

Isn't that a tad arrogant?

Bryan, obviously you've spent too much time in the company of men who don't expect you to think for yourself, who expect you to believe everything they say at face value. And thus, it makes it easy for you to assume we will take your word at face value, as well.

Not a chance, apron boy. Not all of us abandoned our natural sense of reasoning and objective analysis for a secret handshake-- for petty masonic privileges and the false sense of superiority that comes with them.

You cannot prove a thing with secrecy. Thus, you cannot hope to win this argument when you defend things you know nothing about because from day one, you've agreed to have these same things hidden from you. You're obviously clueless as to the history of the Scottish Rite when you didn't even know a Klan founder lies entombed in the SR's temple headquarters in DC. And you're 18th degree? At least they lowered the bar. It'd be nice, and certainly fitting, to see the Shriners parade in a little yellow bus for a change.

Someone once said "For men loved the darkness because they knew their deeds were evil." Tell me who it was who said this. And why your society embraces and protects those who burn his symbol on the lawns of Jews and blacks; if not bombing and burning his churches.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto you:

"See this letter too."

Just a thought

From: DrDreydenAOD@cs.com
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:47:30 EST
Subject: just a thought
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
 

hello, editor.  I am one of open mind, though my views tend to be sueded more liberally than some.  I've read quite a few of the works and many good points are given, but some things are missing.  Firstly, with the Masonic accusations, I'd like more information directly about the Masons- are these the same Masons that do charity and ride around in parades? Granted, the KKK does charity work, too, but I need more Masonic folly to accuse my late grandfather of following such a way.  Second, your disregard of women's rights caught me quite off guard.  Why does abortion need to be kept legal?  Well, it isn't the best thing, in my opinion, but when such limits are put on to freedom, where, then, do they stop?  Certain Muslim society persecutes women for various "infractions."  For example, if a woman is raped, she is imprisoned for longer than the man.  If a woman has a miscarriage, she is imprisoned for infanticide.  If a woman has an abortion (to avoid the growing popularity of "honor killings") after being raped or for health endangering reasons, she is sentenced to death or imprisoned for great lengths of time.  And this doesn't even cover the world-wide (yes, even in America) vaginal mutation of women (called "female circumcision).  Look into it a little just once, and you may see the horrors of oppressing women across the globe.  Finally, I call one thing in to question that you so profusely attack- the Klan itself.  Now, I can't understand how you can accuse the KKK of so many abuses without parralleling it to the power it gets from the NRA.  HOW did you miss this?  And please, rest assured, there are many more dangerous invisible empires out there than a dying principle, and an even older cause in the KKK.  The things you accuse go WAY PAST the KKK.....  the KKK is the surface, a diversion.  There's even more dangerous white supremacy groups- tradition is meaning less and less and the society is dying with the old politicians.  Good Illuminati referance, though, and the Masonic image on the dollar bill was also pleasing.  But I'm going to try to help you out here and point to Russia and ask you- how, exactly, knowing what you know, did mobsters take over Russia?  And you need to think about, what does that have to do with the Middle East war zones directly?  It seems obvious, but it's not as obvious as it looks, that's all I can say- o, and try to get that American connection in there- Ronnie Reagan??? hmm.... anyways, keep up the good work

-Alcibaides

---

Dear Alcibaides,

My disregard of women's rights? Stop yourself right there doc. What gives you the right to speak for all women? I didn't, why should you? The pro-life movement in America is spearheaded by the same woman who gave us abortion via Roe vs. Wade. To imply all women support and promote abortion is an insult to them and a gross generalization.

Norma McCorvey, the Roe in Roe vs. Wade, is in court right now trying to change this decision. No one is forcing her to do it. If anyone is oppressing women, it's the courts who block McCorvey's attempts to re-examine the case.

The Klan does charity work? since when? I'm not sure you're in America or know anything about our history, but these are terrorists and remain so.

As for the NRA, I know they're crooked bastards. If you read It Was Johnson, you have some 900 pages of documentation and videos on everything you asked regarding the masons.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto the NASA Director:

"Thy penis is fake too."

The Moon Video a Fake

From: Dan Cook [mailto:DanielECook@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 5:18 PM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: Moon landing hoax?

http://moontruth.com/full.htm

Go there, they say that the moon video (on your site) was faked. Then go to http://www.moontruth.com/. I don’t know where you got that clip from originally, but it seems to of been faked. I am still at a loss of what to think of this “moon landing”, although I would like to think it’s real. The faked video is, however, very good.

Dan Cook

 

Dear Dan,

Yeppers, the video is a fake. You're right, Dan. My understanding was that the video was made to demonstrate how easy it was to fake a moon landing. Initially I wanted to see how many people would believe the landing was faked upon viewing it, as opposed to how many would cry it was a fake. Then I pretty much forgot all about it since no one really believed the landing was real anyway, except for two people in 200,000:

How to Fake a Moon Landing This might explain why we haven't built a moon colony after 30 years of technological advances; or why we can't even put the space shuttle in lunar orbit. Or it might not. Tell us what you think, email the editor@impiousdigest.com.

Shakespeare sayeth unto the credit card companies:

"Your doom in hell? priceless."

Dear Tom,

Here ya go...the source page is here.

"It was through the introduction of paper debt and fractional reserve banking that...enabled the banking dynasties to loan vast sums of ethereal credit to nations which quickly accrued an un-repayable debit due in the material currency of gold or silver. Thus the power brokers were able to move in and seize control of the financial and economic apparatus of the target nations in question.

"If you find this confusing, apply this principle on an individual level.  Credit cards follow the same principle-- they provide unmaterialized credit, more than you can pay at once or in the near future , and through interest, extended payment plans and fees, the lender quickly assumes control of your  financial assets and purchasing power.  The extended payment plans at first glance seem to favor the consumer, but the longer the payment plans are extended, the more severe a penalty they can impose for default.  Chance itself dictates that within any twelve month period, for instance, the typical consumer will miss a payment or two due to unforeseen expenses or loss of wages.  Soon the consumer  collects bad credit ratings, and finds himself unable to purchase a car or home. Thenceforth, as the consumer struggles to rebuild his credit standing,  the lender controls not only his assets, but his purchasing power.  The control of consumer assets, such as your home, usually comes through unpaid second mortgages.

"Nations, like individuals on a credit frenzy, spend an eternity repaying a massive debt, with their version of the Master Card replaced by the International Monetary Fund. And when these nations default on their paper debt, they surrender whatever material assets they have at their disposal-- ore, precious metals, oil, etc." 

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto the freemasons...

"Be thou not a slave to unseen masters, for behold, thou shalt bind thyself to evil and the enmity of a wronged and trusting nation. Then seeth thou whom art 'profane', beeyotch!"

How do we stop them?

From: xxxxx@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:28:15 EST
Subject: HOW DO WE STOP THEM?
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

MY TOWN IS RUN BY JUDGES AND A PROSECUTOR THAT ARE FREEMASONS. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN LITTLE SYSTEM. THEY MALICOUSLY PROSECUTE INNOCENT "VICTIMS" TO FEED THEIR NEED TO MAKE THEMSELVES "LOOK GOOD." THEY USE THEIR "IMMUNITY" TO JUSTIFY PLAIN OLD COLOR OF LAW!!  SEND ME SOME INFO TO INDIANA, BECAUSE NOBODY IN THIS STATE WANTS TO LOOK INTO ANYTHING                                                                                                      THANKS & GOD BLESS

---

Hey dude,

Lose the caps man. You almost got automatically deleted.

But in regards to your question, the following pages may interest you:

The Patriots John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, John F. Kennedy. What do these presidents all have in common? they spoke out against freemasonry.

The Anti-Masonic Party This was a major political party in 1830, and the answer to your question lies within The Proceedings of the United States Anti-Masonic Convention; Address to the People of the United States:

"Shall we forego, in behalf of' freemasonry, or through fear of it, the primary purpose of civil organization? If we are true to ourselves it is certain we need not forego it; we can practically enforce it: for the rights of election remain. In these may be found full means-- not of punishing the criminals-- but of precluding any repetition of their crimes-- of giving us that security against them, which is better than punishment; which is, indeed, the only proper object of all human punishment. The use of these means we advocate. Our adversaries reprobate it, and represent it as oppressive and persecuting. 

"The exercise of the elective franchise is as much a function of our government as any one performed, by legislatures, executive magistrates, or judges. And the honest, intelligent, and fearless use of it, by all to whom it pertains, is as much a duty...Such a use of the elective function is the duty most imperious, because it is the great corrective, in the last resort, of all other functions. 

"To say that the powers of government should not be applied to the masonic outrages at all, would be so preposterous, as justly to excite suspicion of being implicated in them..."

Catholicism and Freemasonry Pope Leo XIII's Anti-Masonic Encyclical

The Scottish Rite's KKK Project yep, you guessed it, the Klan is a freemasonic fraternity in structure and origin.

The Modus Operandi it's not just your town in Indiana. Look what they did in Chicago.

Local judges and prosecutors have to be elected. Awareness and grassroots mobilization (such as in churches) is the best bet, if indeed, they are as crooked as you say they are.

So the simplest advice? Don't elect them.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Al Gore:

"Hey Al, count this too... I voted Nadar!"

What Are Your Credentials?

From: "Robert & Dennell" <rc_dc@evansinet.com>
To: <editor@impiousdigest.com>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004

What are your credentials, I am trying to determine who's perspective this is written from. Thank you.

Dear Human,

I'm assuming you mean political affiliation, since you asked about perspective. As for credentials, I'm a humble journalist that has stumbled on a sobering realization. What is it? It's that this profession is not sacred here, no one realizes that in a democracy like ours, the press is anything but free. It is gagged by corporate advertisers, it is gagged by editors hungry to please political affiliations, it is gagged by self-interest. And the sacred trust of a vulnerable public is one violated daily.

Thomas Jefferson once wrote "the only honest part of a newspaper is the advertising" and that still holds true.

As the editor I can only speak for myself. I'm neither Democrat or Republican, but do vote from time to time. I do so with my nose held and a troubled conscience when there's only two parties to choose from, and one is faced with choosing a lesser evil. If there is a 3rd party, it generally has my vote not because I think such a candidate can win, but because in a tight race supporting such a candidate will force the major parties to be more responsive to constituent concerns.

As for perspective, it is independent.

In 2000, for instance, I supported Ralph Nadar, particularly after the Gore campaign made a concerted effort to keep him from participating in any major debate, and succeeded. As you know, the election was the closest in history, but the Gore team treated Nadar and his supporters like excrement, rather than valuable swing-voters that could throw their votes to the Dems when and if the Greens endorsed their party. The Gore team locked out Nadar from the debates, though as a candidate Nadar had easily made the ballot in most states.  The reason given was that Nadar could not possibly win, and hence, it was pointless to include him the debates. This, of course, prevented a fair election, and was an affront to free speech and the Green Party. Had Gore allowed Nadar's his right to debate as a candidate, and it was a right, it's likely Nadar would have given Gore his endorsement since both were pro-environment and leaned to the left. And Gore would have won handily with those Green votes. Unfortunately, Gore was a pompous and short-sighted asshole and he deserved what he got in Florida.

Is a vote for Nadar a vote for Bush? That's the cry now, and I'm pleased. Eventually, both candidates will have to address the issues raised by Nadar because they can no longer assume a landslide is a done deal. If Nadar wants to debate on the hard questions reporters dare not ask, he can. And the Dems and GOP will have to answer those questions, or appear incompetent and/or corrupt.

Did I answer you question? if not, eat me.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto NASA

"Mayest thou land on this!"

Moon Landing Hoax? Say it ain't so!

From: "Dan Cook" DanielECook@comcast.net
To: <editor@impiousdigest.com>
Subject: Moon landing hoax?
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004
 

---

Dear Dan,

You raise some good questions.

The question of the moon landing hoax was already addressed convincingly on national television. FOX TV aired a special titled "Did We Really Land on the Moon?" It made a much stronger case than anything presented here. If you can find the video or DVD, buy it. It's very well done and surprisingly objective.

The Japanese moon trip is not a rumor, it's true- a satellite was planned to orbit the moon and take pictures. I have no idea if they went yet, or if they will talk if they do find something amiss. It was supposed to take place in 2003.

What do I think about Iraq? we need to be there. Saddam was funding the suicide bombers in Israel and domestic terrorists in America, particularly the Klan via Imperial Wizard Dennis Mahon in Oklahoma City, and it is no surprise that the fiercest opponent to the war in Iraq, Dixiecrat Sen. Robert Byrd, was a Klan recruiter.

If North Korea was funding domestic terrorists, I'd support a war there too. But to my knowledge this is not the case, they're actually starving over there.

As for advice on making an opinion page, you should ask the author of The Greatest Page in the Universe, Maddox. He kicks ass.

The Ed

From: r.dennis2@lancaster.ac.uk
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:31:03 +0100
Subject: Moon Landing
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

"This might explain why we haven't built a moon colony after 30 years of technological advances; or why we can't even put the space shuttle in lunar orbit." I assume thats (sic) not a serious qestion. (sic) Of course the moon landings took place. Rock samples taken from the moon agreed with rock samples taken by a russian (sic)probe later on. Getting to the moon isnt (sic) difficult with enough funding, and is easily possible with '60 technology. The space shuttle cant go into lunar orbit cos (sic) it was never designed to.

Shakespeare sayeth unto Gullible Englishman and Trekkie:

"We're number one!"

Dear Gullible Englishman,

It was a serious question. Let me address each stabbing pain of idiocy you have inflicted upon the wary skeptic:

1. "Rock samples taken from the moon agreed with rock samples taken by a russian (sic) probe later on." The rock samples agreed? Agreed on what? how much of a tard you are? Martian rock samples have been discovered in the South Pole. Did they travel here via shuttle? of course not. They were, it is believed, propelled here by asteroid or meteor hits on Mars that sent projectiles hurling into space. Now, Mars has an atmosphere to slow them down. The Moon does not, and is much, much closer. Thus, Moon rocks on earth are not as rare as you might think.  And if you look at the Moon's craters on a clear night, you would know that it is and has been constantly bombarded by meteors and asteroids. When that happened, there was little to slow the projectile's launch into space and into Earth.

In other words, I got your Russian rock samples hanging right here.

2. "Getting to the moon is easy with enough funding, and is easily possible with '60 technology."  It is 2004. If we could land a man on the moon in 1969, then landing a probe on Mars would be child's play, no? We did it in 1976, supposedly. It's 2004 and we can barely land a rover on Mars and have it call home...and we only just did it after numerous failed attempts, which calls into question any claims we had already done it 25 years earlier. You guys tried it and failed this year. Has your Beagle Mars probe called home yet?  No. And I'm sorry to hear it. The truth is, your technology is as good as ours. The only difference is, if your probe doesn't call home, you're most likely to be told the truth about it. It's not because your government is more honest- it's not. It's because your space program isn't the giant establishment tit that it is here in America.

3.  "The space shuttle cant go into lunar orbit cos (sic) it was never designed to." Hmm. Okay bright boy. Look up the word "shuttle" and ponder the implication. What then, was it designed to do? If it was just to study Earth from space, it would be an orbiter, not a shuttle. Semantics aside, let's cut to the chase: the space program of the 60s and early 70s had virtually unlimited funding and practically no oversight for the billions funneled into the program. A staged landing would enrich quite a number of people in the military industrial complex who would be employed in providing missile and electronic technology. Werner VonBraun, the ex-Nazi rocket scientist of the V-1 and V-II fame, came from the military wing. Since it was a "space race" with the Russians they could charge exorbitant prices for nothing at all, and basically spend the rest on a studio broadcast of a landing and launch into space. The Johnson Space Center and Cape Canaveral wouldn't have been built as stage props, they would serve a purpose in perfecting missile technology for the military.  (Remember the 800 dollar toilet seat on the shuttle? You think there was oversight?)

You may think it sounds like a wild conspiracy theory, and that's fine. If you want to believe elected leaders in America are incapable of misleading their constituents, embezzling, or bribery, well, you're free to do that. And you're free to blow me. There is the way the world works, and the way television (in your case the Disney Channel) says it works. You still have a few questions to answer though.

If we did land, why the fuck don't we have a lunar base 30 years later?

This year, President Bush just proposed a 15 year plan aimed at achieving what you claim we can already do: establish a lunar base. What do you know that our President does not, eh genius?

If we did land, why can't the space-based Hubble Telescope take a picture of the flag we left, or any other signs of arrival? NASA has been asked the same questions time and time again, and not surprisingly, have now decided to shut down the Hubble Space Telescope program.  They have quite an aversion to aiming that telescope at the moon...is it too close? I think so- to exposing the lying, crooked bastards.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Anna:

"Thou fool, doest thou not know the lynched, the scapegoat and oppressed need attention first?"

On Senator Byrd and The Klan

Shakespeare sayeth unto George Gorton:

"Thou fool, political consultants are hired to lie."

A Rebuttal by Schwarzenegger's Political Consultant

From: George Gorton [mailto:xxxxx@xxxx.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:14 AM
To: editor@impiousdigest.com
Subject: From Schwarzenegger's political consultant

Hi, my name is George Gorton, and, as you identify in your article, am one of Governor Schwarzenegger's political consultants, and yes, I had a bit part in Watergate 31 years ago (in the book but didn't make the movie). 

 

I'm writing because your article misinterprets a statement in All the President's Men , and then states that misinterpretation as fact.  It is indeed embarrassing, as you point out, and it is not true. 

 

Let me be clear.  I did not conceive of, discuss, contemplate or direct Ted Brill or any one else to plant drugs on Quakers or anyone else, and would never do so or allow anyone else to do so.  Ted Brill did not do so to my knowledge, nor did anyone else.

 

Further, it would be immoral in the extreme to plant drugs on anyone, and it's most likely a felony.

 

No one at the time, including Bob Woodward, nor anyone in the succeeding 31 years, has said I did such a thing, except you.  You're out there all alone on this one.

 

I don't know what Bob Woodward meant by "set up" a drug raid, but he didn't mean plant drugs. I know this because the book is based on the press coverage.  The Washington Post never printed an allegation that drugs were to be planted by anyone.

 

In fact contrary to the embellishments and/or fabrications by the student (Hilligass) quoted,  who had no first hand knowledge of anyhting, [sic] but was relating his version of stories told to him that both Brill and I have denied, the only thing I know about drugs and Ted is that one day he called me and said non Quaker radicals who were there were going to have a drug party and I told him to get out of there.  I told him to do so for his own protection.  I did not pass the information on to anyone, or do anything with it.  That is the only thing I know about drugs and the White House Quakers.

 

Also, I was not fired by the CRP and I have never been fired by anyone.  I served as National College Director until the end of the campaign without a hint of problems, and was hired by the Inaugural Committee controlled by the same people.  I then went to work for Commerce as a 90 day appointment and I still have the US Government personnel papers that show my appointment, and that my appointment expired uneventfully whereupon I moved back to San  Diego.

 

So this sort of thing is used by other political consultants in hit pieces and could easily cost me clients and my carear, [sic] not to mention anger and disdain from the public and opinion leaders.  So in the interest of fairness, good journalism, truth, and doing the right thing, would you puleeeaase print a retraction, to wit:  Contrary to reports in our publication, George Gorton, National College Director for The Committee to Re-elect the President in 1972, did not conceive of think about discuss or arrange for drugs to be planted on anyone, did not arrange a drug bust of any kind, and was not fired from the Committee to Re-elect the President.

 

Thanks, let me know.  You may have questions and If you want to talk, give me a call at XXX XXX XXXX. Merry Christmas and a Happy New year to you and your family.

George Gorton

George,

 

Ahh yes. Truth. I'm glad you brought that up. Let us examine your greatest claim to fame, your role in getting Gov. Pete Wilson into the California governor's mansion.

You know, it's not like I'm running those divisive "they keep coming" ads you commissioned in 1994.  Honestly, if that ever happens, then you should worry, especially if it's true that the "INS border footage" of immigrants pouring over the Mexican border was actually staged for effect.

Now, if the anti-immigrant hysteria of Prop 187 wasn't enough, your team also promulgated the attack on affirmative action, Prop 209, another racially divisive measure. You may not think either was racially divisive, but let us look at the result as reported by the San Francisco Examiner in 1995:

This activity of yours in 1994 and later fits into a pattern you exhibited during the Watergate era, and it does so perfectly. In that case, you were accused of  trying to set up some Quaker war protesters to appear as drug users, hippies: in other words, a crass attempt to scapegoat an innocent class of people: Vietnam war protesters.  Whether immigrants, minorities, Quakers or war protesters, you and these scapegoats have a knack for being at the same place, at the same time.

 

Whether intentional or not, the Klan and Aryan Nation were mobilized in this state thanks to the immigrant bashing of Prop. 187, which you and Wilson earnestly championed.  The Aryan Nation's leader, Richard Butler, in fact, made Wilson Aryan Nation Hero of the Year in 1995 for his support of both aforementioned measures. This made national news, and it didn't help in his disastrous bid for the presidency.

"[California Governor Pete] Wilson received unsolicited praise from Aryan Nation leader Richard Butler at the annual Aryan World Congress in Idaho on July 21, 1995. Butler bestowed hero status on Wilson for his successful assault on affirmative action. 'Wilson is beginning to wake up to Aryan views.'"

--San Francisco Examiner, July 23, 1995.

Now you tell me, where does your heart have to be, how transparent must your hatred be to win the admiration of white separatists and terrorists like the Klan and Aryan Nation? After all, these are people who masturbate to the likes of Adolf Hitler and Tim McVeigh.

 

That said, let me direct your attention to events in Dallas as recent as Nov. 26, 2003. Have a look at Dallas news coverage of the Klan's attempts to blow up a power plant in 1997; and the recent FBI arrests in a poison gas plot late last month, in Dallas also. (For more, click here.)This is a matter taken so seriously by the White House that Bush had been briefed daily on it as events transpired.

 

Speaking of blackouts: was it just yesterday that San Francisco was blacked out? Are we not presently in an ORANGE ALERT? Was it not last summer that the whole northeastern grid was blacked out? Should we worry at all that the Klan has such an insatiable interest in blacking out major US cities, when any military strategist knows the only reason anyone would bother to blow up a power plant is as a prelude for a military strike, be it guerilla or otherwise?

In other words, consider this:

blackout + poison gas attack= maximum civilian casualties.

 

Now, I'm not saying it was the Klan/neo-Nazis behind the northeastern blackout, or perhaps even the one this weekend in Northern California. Maybe it was an accident, maybe someone tripped on the cord and shut down the generators and it just so happened it came during an Orange Alert. I'll let you decide that on your own.

Regardless, it's these domestic terrorists- the Klan and Aryan Nation-  who see a hero in your little friend, former California Gov. Pete Wilson, your ideological mirror image whom you advised and influenced.  It's these domestic terrorists who would love to see our state and nation divided, who would love to have a flag-bearer at Arnold's ear.

Have I misconstrued many of your own positions? If so, my apologies, but unless you give me sources other than your word alone, there's no reason for me to believe you.  Spin is your bread and butter George, you're a political advisor, you engineer political campaigns. You know better than to ask ANYONE to take you at your word alone. Asking me retract an article just because you say so means slapping my own sources in the face.  Now, if Bob Woodward himself were to ask me to do it, yes I'd retract it. After all, he wrote the book in question, and the article quoted directly from his Woodward's book.

Merry Christmas to you and yours, George.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto James:

"Verily, I gotteth thy latent print and straw man right here."

Mac Wallace Fingerprint

From: "James K. Olmstead" <Thpa2d@onecom.com>
To: <editor@impiousdigest.com>
Subject: Mac Wallace fingerprint
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:26:39 -0800

I would like to discuss the issue of the Mac Wallace fingerprint on your site.

First question is which latent from Box A are you comparing?

Second question is why is the Wallace print presented a "composite" of two images?

Thanks very much

James K. Olmstead

Dear James,

Well guess what?  I would not like to discuss the issue of Mac Wallace or Box A or anything other than why Johnson didn't have  manifest culpability in the assassination. It states plainly, on the front page, why the superimposition of the prints was done:  for comparison.  The prints are the least of the story. The Johnson tapes denoted in the video stream, the history of pardoned Klan atrocities since 1963, and other more recent developments damn him with unshakeable certainty. Why I am even answering this is a mystery, because you obviously didn't read of the paragraph describing the print's origin or any of the pertinent material on the page.  Read it again, and then write back. The answer was already there.  If you are a federal investigator, and are asking for help in re-opening the case or help with any similar attempt to correct an unfathomable national tragedy, we'll talk at length. If this be the case, forgive my rudeness, my lack of patience.  Otherwise...

Pity I don't see you asking me why his own lawyers are asserting Johnson's guilt in the assassination. I don't see you asking or seeking to discuss anything relevant to the issue at hand, that Johnson was responsible.  If you want to discuss other "theories" this isn't the place.  This humble little website has a lot of work ahead of it to challenge 40 years of propaganda, and if you think we'll waste our time with straw men or nitpicking over silly diversions, you're cordially invited to blow me.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Mark

"Thou giveth men and beast the unholy embrace of thy deflowered colon."

Latest batch of oral sex donations...

Acceptable:

Jag--

You have received a donation of 4 acts of fellatio from dinalicious (diphunk@yahoo.com).

The donor added this comment:

I'm really good at it--let me know if you want more!

-----

NOT Acceptable:

Jag--

You have received a donation of 50 acts of fellatio from mark (hotmale@hotmail.com).

The donor added this comment:

i will take anal too.

To All Future Fellatio Donators:

Please guys, I know the thought of my anaconda-like ambassador of vaginal good will brings any dude to question his sexual identity, but I'm straight. Women only please.

The Ed

Shakespeare sayeth unto Carl

"Mimes are from France."

 Violence against Mimes not cool

SlingbladeCarI@aol.com
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 07:29:15 -0600
Subject: Encouraging violence not cool
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

What's with the bitch slap a mime campaign? that supposed to be funny, motherfucker, encouraging people to beat up on performing artists? What's next? kick a street musician in the face? My dad is a mime and he makes more money at one gig than you will see in your whole pathetic life.  You're a sick and twisted fucker and I hope all the people who send in money get their asses kicked. Your site sucks and i will never visit it again.

I should hunt you down and kill you. But I will call a lawyer instead...

Please just die asshole.

Carl

Dear Carl,

I was wondering whose dad that was in the picture of the bitch slapped mime. So it was yours, huh?

Listen man, mimes are evil. I'm tired of going to the mall and consoling little children scared shitless by unfunny and annoying mimes. I'm not alone in this. A recent Gallop poll noted 97% of all women fantasize of slapping the shit out of mimes during sex. This includes your mom.

 Also, mimes are from France. Enough said.

Shakespeare sayeth unto Cloe

"Abortions tickle."

Abortion is not funny

From: GirlPawerSpice@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 23:02:00 EDT
Subject: Abortion is not funny
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

To hoom it may concern

Me and my friends used to like your web site, for the Madonna videos and stuff, but this time you have gone too far.

I don't know what difference your stupid site will make, cuz abortion will always be legal no matter how many movies and digusting pictures of dead babies you put online, which I'll bet are probably fake!

i'm sure your a man and never had to have one, so you dont know how hard it is on a girl to have an abortion.

i think your site is bad for free speech and womens rights and I will make sure to email all my friends and tell them to boycott your fruit juice sponsors

your a coward and a showvanist and I bet you dont have the guts to post this email.  I am contacting my friends at NOW and Planned Parenthood so they will take down your stupid site.

Cloe

Dear Cloe,

Allow me to answer your email item by item.

It must be conceded that your efforts to launch a full-scale boycott against our "fruit juice sponsors" has made me question the wisdom of posting controversial material on this site. As you requested in the follow-up letter, here's the contact information of this sponsor. This olive branch is extended in hopes that you and other concerned readers may reconsider and retract your threat of boycott:

Representatives of the Fool Aid juice box company can be emailed here: foolaid@isnotrealyoudumbfuck.com. You may also fill in a complaint at their website here: http://foolaidneverexistedyoudipshit.com

How could you not notice the juice box advertisement is an obvious Photoshop fake? Doesn't the idea of a retarded kid on a fruit juice box that reads "now fortified with paint chips!" strike you as even a little bit fishy?

And where, in any of the editorial posts is abortion treated as a joke?

As for the "fake" photos. The photographs in the abortion editorial are not fake.  In fact, the people at the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform which provided the photos sued and won in cases against abortion providers "hoom" tried to prohibit their public display on university campuses.

Feel free to contact your friends at NOW and Planned Parenthood or anyone else to "hoom" English is not a second language. They may not shave their pits and their breath may always reek of Summers Eve or Vagisil, but at least they can spell.

Finally, before you go and launch your next boycott of another company that doesn't exist, please note that our "showvanist" sources are perhaps the most credible and compelling you will ever find. And why is that?

Shakespeare sayeth unto sk8erKiNg:

"Smell my finger. Doest thou recognize thy mom?"

Hacker Chivalry

From: sk8erKiNg@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:58:05 EDT
Subject: you're inmature
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

hey asshole

that wuz pretty fucked up how u answered Cloe.

Cloe is my girlfriend and you know what? I had never seen her cry until she saw what u posted about her email. did that make u happy? that was fucked up, man

I know a hacker friend or two and we'll see how funny it is when they DoD ur stupid ass

you think your right about everything but guess what? your not! you don't know how to treat a real lady.

stupid fag

 

 

Dear sk8erKiNg,

DOD my ass? You're gonna Department of Defense my ass, you fucking retard? or did you mean DOS my ass, launch a denial of service against lil' ol' me?

You almost had me scared there, geek boy. So scared I had to scour the earth to find your picture so I could defend myself. And this is what I found. Don't ask me how I got your picture. I won't tell. And by the way, for another candid shot of you before you gained all that weight, click here.

Shakespeare sayeth unto Ken "Thy art truly is deserving of the coveted  Impious Artist of the Month award."

Congratulations Ken! You've won a Luvin' Lamb! Official Impious Digest Consolation Prize UPDATE: This is Ken after he received his prize. He was so delighted he had just had to send us a pic.

San Francisco low on gay guys?

From: KenMDo@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:58:05 EDT
Subject: queer
To: editor@impiousdigest.com

hey fagget i heard sanfransisco  is low on gay guys. im not one hundred percent% sure but i think this may be your calling.        all be talking to you soon see'ya when i see'ya

Dear Ken,

Truly, your attached caricature and photo was an inspired work of genius.  In fact, it's some of the best art I've seen in weeks, worthy of MoMA. Congratulations, you've won yourself a Lovin' Lamb® Inflatable Sheep and are hereby declared Impious Artist of the Month!

As for the gay guy deficit in San Francisco, I hear that only happened after you moved to West Hollywood to write Mentos and tampon commercials.

According to my Sep. 2002 issue of Stupid Roving Homosexuals of North America, it reads "Ken's departure loss left a huge vacuum in the gay community...a hole, unfortunately, not so easily or readily filled as his own chocolate love canal..."

Who appointed you the gay guy census bureau, anyway?