"Scientific method is for morans..." Dr. Shyam Sunder (pictured), one of the first clinically retarded  scientists to head a federal agency under a new pilot program aimed at the exclusive hiring of the mentally disabled and insane.  SCAT, or "Scientard Commission Against Thermodynamics" was the fruit of this labor. The Lone Nut Fire Theory NIST computer simulation used in lieu of actual experiments. Why? because the results could not be duplicated in real life. It is impossible. Burned out buildings with steel girders and concrete exteriors leave a shell after all burnable materials are consumed. Witness Dresden and Hamburg in WWII: even after a fire storm with incendiaries steel did not melt. Below is Hamburg, which endured high explosives and incendiaries. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is a federal scientific agency which promotes technical industrial standards. The stakes, therefore, are high. Sunder's credentials from MIT should, in all seriousness, be revoked for the sake of the school's reputation, unless they want it on record that one of their own can officially rewrite the laws of physics and set an unreliable, laughable standard for all proceeding students to follow.

On Thursday, August 21 2008, a new WTC 7 theory was proposed by administration appointees at The National Institute of Standards and Technology to explain its mysterious collapse. They declared the building, which was hit by neither plane yet still collapsed in a freefall, was felled by a "new phenomenon" we shall hereafter refer to as the Lone Nut Fire Theory. It was a theory so new that had never been seen in the history of architecture or science, so new it could only be reproduced in a ridiculous computer simulation: diesel fuel burning at a temperature hot enough to melt an engine.  Isn't that neat? and CNN not only buys it but ridicules credible experts who question the idiotic assertion! Now, you don't throw your pearls before swine. Truth is a pearl, and the war pigs war profiteers own the networks directly and indirectly, their hooves aching to trample those pearls underfoot.

It is called a Lone Nut Fire because it didn't behave like a normal, sane fire would. A normal fire would stop burning when all combustible materials are consumed. However, the Lone Nut Fire was a "new phenomenon" as NIST claims, and would have none of that. It would defy the laws of physics and thermodynamics and burn when all fuel from the diesel generators and any other combustible material should have been exhausted, and burn hot enough to melt steel. It's magic doesn't end there, no, it was also a demolitions specialist  and would also target and melt critical, specific support beams in the architecture to create a uniform freefall collapse. As far as fires go, this one was nuts, as batshit crazy as the brown-nosing commission of douchebags who invented it, but it was talented.

This isn't an effort to persuade those at CNN, an actual military propaganda asset whose agenda is no different than that of FOX News. This is more about you. What exactly gives them any motivation to tell you the truth, when the truth is they make a living off getting you to act against your best interest,  such as buying goods you don't need by airing stories designed to manipulate viewers and influence the market. Expensive vaccines, for example, are always going to benefit from hype about the latest disease. If your sponsor is a drug company, they profit from that fear when selling their miracle cure or treatment. If it is a military contractor, they profit from stories that encourage fearing and hating people whom never wronged you because it makes war more palatable. In other words, the 30 second commercial is meaningless when a story, or anchor droning on constantly about the same foreign scapegoats, can sell a war by making hate and fear-mongering pass off as news or "entertainment".

So why should you expect any semblance of truth, or civic duty, from CNN and its ilk?

Computer Models Made Predictions Impossible to Duplicate with Test Buildings

Scientific method demands that a hypothesis be tested and its results be repeatable before it is accepted as fact. This, too, was a prerequisite ignored by NIST. Was a building of WTC 7's exact specifications ever built to test the hypothesis that diesel fuel from emergency generators could burn hot enough to melt steel? Although the report summary states that diesel fuel was not responsible for the collapse, it cites fire as the main cause of the collapse. Talk about inconsistent. What then, fueled the Lone Nut Fire? paper?

Computer models alone don't count, and that's exactly what they relied on here. Why? because when you propose an impossible theory and it cannot be duplicated with a test building and criteria matching the hypothesis, computer simulations are all you have. Even when they're used, it's only to predict an outcome within the given parameters, and usually the predictions are used to design a physical experiment. Computer models are not a replacement for actual testing and only a dumb ass would claim it was.

Any script kiddie can create a dubious computer model where a slight modification of a Clapper can make dogs fly backwards and glow in the dark; but unless the computer model's prediction of Clapper-induced canine flight holds up with actual flight testing and peer review, it's worthless. All of which is to say, in layman's terms, "Hey Dr. Sunders, go fuck yourself you brown-nosing quack."

Incidentally, you know who else believes the official story and will likely diddle his anal clitoris to this hilarious NIST report? Bill Maher, a one man crusade to change the laws of physics and thermodynamics. There must be some cognitive dissonance, however, he certainly can't be THAT much an imbecile. Maybe he's just pissed that he has to whore himself and mislead viewers to keep sponsors, and that ultimately, he's a willing tool of the very administration he rails against constantly.

My first impulse was the same you'd get when someone pisses on your face and calls it rain. You get really, really annoyed. But then I thought for a moment, and it dawned on me this was a wonderful opportunity for critics and real scientists to attack and expose the glaring inconsistencies, flaws, and outright lies in the official story. Thermite, used in demolitions and which can burn through steel, was found in abundance at the site, e.g.. Also, the BBC was reporting the building as already down 20 minutes before it actually collapsed. You can even see the building, still standing, in the background's live feed as the claim is made. What this means, at the very least, is foreknowledge of what NIST claimed was an unpredictable "new phenomenon" (Rudy Guiliani also let it slip that the building would collapse.) At worst, the foreknowledge implies high level complicity from Mayor Guiliani's office, not just in a controlled demolition, but a false flag operation designed to spur an oil war in the middle east. According to Gen. Wesley Clarke (Ret.), the Bush plan called for the invasion of seven nations in the space of five years, which first came to his attention in September of 2001. (See video at bottom inset.)

Pitted against Dr. Shyam Sunder of NIST is  Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and a member of the American Institute of Architects. As noted in RawStory:

[Gage's] group, which has swelled to over 400 architectural and engineering professionals, immediately responded to the Institute's claim in a press conference..

"Tons of [molten metal] was found 21 days after the attack," said Gage in an interview with a Vancouver, Canada television station. "Steel doesn't begin to melt until 2,700 degrees, which is much hotter than what these fires could have caused."

"There are holes in this story that you can drive a truck through," Gage added during the press conference. His group asserts that thermite, a steel cutting agent, was used to bring the building down.

Sunder's credntials from MIT should, in all seriousness, be revoked for the sake of the school's reputation, unless they want it on record that one of their own can officially rewrite the laws of physics and set an unreliable, laughable standard for all proceeding students to follow. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is a federal scientific agency which promotes technical industrial standards. The stakes, therefore, are high enough to warrant such severity.

Here's a primer for Sunder since clearly, the scientific method is a concept more alien to him than self-respect...

The Scientific Method

• Define the question (what caused the collapse?)
• Gather information and resources (observe)
• Form hypothesis
• Perform experiment and collect data
• Analyze data
• Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
• Publish results
• Retest (frequently done by other scientists)

The Sunder Method

• Define the question ("How do we convince experts that fire alone caused the abnormal freefall consistent only with demolitions?")
• Gather information and resources (only those facts which support or partially support lone fire theory)
• Form hypothesis ("Stop laughing. Fire caused it. I'm serious.")
• Perform experiment and collect data. No experiment on test building conducted, only computer simulation.
• Analyze data (WTC 7 videos and documents)
• Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis Conclusion was drawn at the beginning.
• Publish results
• Retest (frequently done by other scientists). No retest possible since experiment was never conducted.

A New Hypothesis

• Define the question (Is Dr. Sunder a fraud and scat muncher?)
• Gathered information and resources (WTC 7 report and diet-related data)
• Form hypothesis (Dr. Sunder is, indeed, a fraud and scat muncher)
• Perform experiment and collect data (monitor his reaction to a plate of feces and spoon; and if no objective, scientific testing is possible, resort to computer simulations of him eating scat and call it experimentation using the Sunder Methodology)
• Analyze data
• Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis (Impious Digest computer simulation confirms hypothesis)
• Publish results (yes, he is a scat munching fraud)
• Retest (frequently done by other scientists).